Comic Gallery: TONTO (1952)

Forgotten Books: DISCOVERING THE MALTESE FALCON AND SAM SPADE (2005)

This amazing volume is packed with so much information I'm tempted to say it's everything you'd  ever want to know on the subject. But after 342 two-columned, small-print pages, it provides a list of over ninety more suggestions "For Further Reading." 

In fact, there is so much cool stuff in this book I despair of even attempting to describe it all, and will resort instead to overwhelming you with the table of contents. Beyond that, be it known that there are many, many photographs, reproduced articles and manuscript pages, letters, advertisements, magazine and book covers, movie posters, and miscellanea. 

Suffice it to say that for Hammett fans (and if you're not one, you should be) this is one hell of book. You'll get your money's worth, and then some.

Pulp Gallery: Opening Day for AMERICA'S GAME!

 1917

 1936

 1942

1938

Comic Gallery: PRINCE VALIANT

 1941

 1955

1956

1956

PHANTOM LADY vs. the "Knights of the Crooked Cross" by Matt Baker (1947)

Phantom Lady, created by Eisner & Iger Studios, made her debut in Police Comics in 1941, but didn't hit her stride until 1947, when Matt Baker took over the drawing board in Phantom Lady 13. This ish was uploaded to comicbookplus by Flatterman. Great job, Flat.

WEIRD TALES 71, 72 & 73 (1929)

  

Movie Posters of 1913

Forgotten Books: TO TRY MEN'S SOULS by New Gingrich and William R. Forstchen (2009)

In gearing up to visit George Washington's Mount Vernon® later this year, I googled around for historical fiction featuring old Georgie. And found surprisingly little. Along with a one called Citizen Washington by William Martin (which I'm now reading), only three pop to the surface. This is one of those three, first in a trilogy by Gingrich and Forstchen. If anyone can name other novels, I'd be pleased to hear about them.

To Try Men's Souls begins on Christmas Night, 1775, and ends the evening of the following day. As you've likely guessed from the cover, the action focuses on the celebrated Crossing of the Delaware, and the all-important Battle of Trenton. 

Actually, heroic as it was, the Crossing wasn't all that important, or the Battle either, except that they gave Washington and his men their first taste of victory (after several disastrous defeats), and emboldened them to carry on. The feeling conveyed here is that without this small win, they would have all given up and gone home. 

I find that pretty hard to believe. Washington was used to defeat, and could likely have absorbed another. His overall strategy was just to keep his army alive and avoid conflict unless he could be pretty damn sure of victory. The Crossing the the Battle were both very risky endeavors, and he was mighty lucky to get away with them. But I have to believe that if they had never taken place - or even resulted in defeat - he would have kept on trucking, likely with the same result. 

Still, it's a good story, and Gingrich and Forstchen tell it well. Point of view alternates between Washington himself, Tom Paine (the Common Sense guy) and a common man volunteer from New Jersey, named Jonathan. 

With George, we feel the problems and pressures heaped upon him by the Continental Congress, the British, the Hessians, the tories, his soldiers, Mother Nature, Providence, Martha and he himself. 

With Paine, we feel the pain of expectations, and the guilty fear that he may have led everyone astray. Soldiers carry copies of Common Sense in their packs, and either revere him or revile him, depending on they react to trudging around New England without clothes, or shoes, or food, or pay. 

With Jonathan, we feel every bit of that misery resulting from those deprivations, plus a family that has taken the easy way out and sided with the British. 

Gingrich and Fortschen have collaborated on a good number of other books, and this is my first. My guess is that Gringrich provides most of the historical detail, while Forstchen cranks out the prose. But that is just a guess. I've found nothing online describing their writing methods. Anyway, they do a good job of bringing history alive. 

My only complaint is that there are a lot of musings and flashbacks, particularly in Washington's POV, about earlier battles, which I don't know enough about to fully appreciate. OK, that's partly my fault, but still disturbing. I guess the authors can't be blamed for starting here, rather than with all the drubbings, which would NOT have resulted in a rousing read. 

The following books in the trilogy are Valley Forge and Victory at Yorktown. Rumor has it those books are less laden with flashbacks, and since I  toured both sites a few years ago, I expect to like them even better than this one. 

The Art of WALTER POPP